Air-Dried and Wet Fixation on Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) Specimen
Abstract
Two fixation methods can affect the quality of cytological staining derived from fine-needle aspiration biopsy, but both fixation methods have drawbacks. Dry fixation can cause cell rupture, while wet fixation requires a longer time and costs more, so dry fixation is more often used. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the Diff-Quick staining of cytological preparations that were fixed with the dry fixation method and the wet fixation method on FNAB samples. This study was an experimental study with 36 samples of cytology preparations from FNAB, divided into three groups, the control group, dry fixation group, and wet fixation group. Staining dry fixation preparations gave four poor results, five good preparations, and three very good preparations while staining wet fixation preparations gave 0 poor results, eight good preparations, and four very good preparations. This shows that the staining results of wet-fixed preparations tend to be of better quality and more consistent than the staining results of dry-fixed preparations. Even though statistically through the test Post-Hoc showed no difference, the quality of Diff-Quick staining of cytological preparations fixed by wet fixation method was better than dry fixation, so the wet fixation method was more recommended for cytological preparations than FNAB.
There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References
2. Al-Abbadi MA. Basics of cytology. Avicenna J Med. 2011;01(01):18-28. doi:10.4103/2231-0770.83719.
3. Shidham VB, Kampalath B, England J. Routine Air Drying of All Smears Prepared During Fine Needle Aspiration and Intraoperative Cytology Studies. Acta Cytol. 2001;45(1):60-68. doi:10.1159/000327188.
4. Khan MZ, Haleem A, Al Hassani H, Kfoury H. Cytopathological grading, as a predictor of histopathological grade, in ductal carcinoma (NOS) of breast, on air-dried Diff-Quik smears. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;29(4):185-193. doi:10.1002/dc.10285.
5. Alsharif M, Carlo-Demovich J, Massey C, et al. Telecytopathology for immediate evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118(3):119-126. doi:10.1002/cncy.20074.
6. Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Whitaker D. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. 5th ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
7. Gupta S. Rehydration of air-dried cervical smears: a feasible alternative to conventional wet fixation. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(4):761-764. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00771-3.
8. Krafts K, Pambuccian S. Romanowsky staining in cytopathology: history, advantages and limitations. Biotech Histochem. 2011;86(2):82-93. doi:10.3109/10520295.2010.515492.
9. Kapse SS, Arakeri SU, Yerranguntla DP. Rehydration of Air-Dried Smears with Normal Saline: An Alternative for Conventional Wet Fixation Method in Cervical Cytological Study. J Cytol. 2018;35(4):199-203. doi:10.4103/JOC.JOC_186_17.
10. Jörundsson E, Lumsden JH, Jacobs RM. Rapid Staining Techniques in Cytopathology: A Review and Comparison of Modified Protocols for Hematoxylin and Eosin, Papanicolaou and Romanowsky Stains. Vet Clin Pathol. 1999;28(3):100-108. doi:10.1111/j.1939-165X.1999.tb01057.x.
11. Rupinder K, Shubra W, Kanwal M. Rehydration of Air-Dried Smears versus Wet Fixation: A Cross-Sectional Study. Acta Cytol. 2013;57(4):364-368. doi:10.1159/000351362.
12. Lowe J, Anderson P, Stevens A. Lowe’s Human Histology. 4th ed. Elsevier/Mosby; 2015.
13. Khristian E, Inderiati D. Sitohistoteknologi. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2017.
14. Narayanan O. DN, Bai DA. Comparison of different methods of fixation in Papanicolaou staining of cervical smears: Wet-fixation and rehydration of air dried smears. Trop J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;5(1):15-19. doi:10.17511/jopm.2019.i01.03.
15. Prasaad PR. Short-duration Papanicolaou stain (SPS)—an alternative to conventional Papanicolaou stain in routine cytopathology? Comp Clin Path. 2017;26(6):1285-1288. doi:10.1007/s00580-017-2524-1.
16. Jackson DE, Selting KA, Spoor MS, Henry CJ, Wiedmeyer CE. Evaluation of fixation time using Diff-Quik for staining of canine mast cell tumor aspirates. Vet Clin Pathol. 2013;42(1):99-102. doi:10.1111/vcp.12012.
17. Youssef D, Shams W, Ganote CE, Al-Abbadi MA. Negative Image of Blastomyces on Diff-Quik Stain. Acta Cytol. 2011;55(4):377-381. doi:10.1159/000327721.
18. Rick L Cowell, Meinkoth JH, Tayler RD, DeNicola DD. Diagnostic Cytology and Hematology of the Dog and Cat. 4 ed. St. Elsevier Inc; 2008.
19. Jhala N, Jhala D. Definitions in Tissue Acquisition. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24(1):19-27. doi:10.1016/j.giec.2013.08.005.
20. Wolman M. Problems of Fixation in Cytology, Histology, and Histochemistry. In: Histology. and Histochemistry. Internaitonal Review of Cytology. Vol 4. ; 1955:79-102. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60455-6.
21. Randall B, van Amerongen L. Commercial laboratory practice evaluation of air-dried/rehydrated cervicovaginal smears vs. traditionally-fixed smears. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;16(2):174-176. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199702)16:2<174::AID-DC16>3.0.CO;2-J.
22. Safneck JR, Kutryk E, Chrobak A, Harper R, Ravinsky E. Fixation Techniques for Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Smears Prepared Off Site. Acta Cytol. 2001;45(3):365-371. doi:10.1159/000327632.
How to Cite This
Copyright and Permissions
Publishing your paper with Jurnal Teknologi Laboratorium (JTL) means that the author or authors retain the copyright in the paper. JTL granted an exclusive reuse license by the author(s), but the author(s) are able to put the paper onto a website, distribute it to colleagues, give it to students, use it in your thesis etc, even commercially. The author(s) can reuse the figures and tables and other information contained in their paper published by JTL in future papers or work without having to ask anyone for permission, provided that the figures, tables or other information that is included in the new paper or work properly references the published paper as the source of the figures, tables or other information, and the new paper or work is not direct at private monetary gain or commercial advantage.
JTL journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets others remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
JTL journal Open Access articles are distributed under this Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA). Articles can be read and shared for All purposes under the following conditions:
- BY: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- SA: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.